``A narrowly divided Supreme Court extended Thursday a life-support line to some 650,000 so-called ``Dreamers,`` allowing them to remain safe from deportation for now, while the Trump administration jumps through... Who's Online | Find Members | Private Messages
Questions
Quizzes
Articles
My Journal
Forums
Quests. | Journs. | Gen. | News | Quiz | Links | TV | Music | Movies | Games | Sports | Sug. | Lit. | Jokes | Artcls. | Newb | O.S.
Supreme Court Rules Against Trump Administration In DACA Case

Back to Thread List
Bottom Last Post

24 days ago - Thursday 6/18/20 - 12:53:39 PM EST (GMT-5)
"A narrowly divided Supreme Court extended Thursday a life-support line to some 650,000 so-called "Dreamers," allowing them to remain safe from deportation for now, while the Trump administration jumps through the administrative hoops that the court said are required before ending the program.

The vote was 5-to-4, with Chief Justice John Roberts casting the decisive fifth vote that sought to bridge the liberal and conservative wings of the court.

Roberts and the court's four liberal justices said the Department of Homeland Security's decision to rescind DACA was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act."

https://www.npr.org/2020/06/18/8298...
24 days ago - Thursday 6/18/20 - 1:37:18 PM EST (GMT-5)
APA for the win!
24 days ago - Thursday 6/18/20 - 3:28:29 PM EST (GMT-5)
These close wins for issues that should be no-brainers just proves we can't have 4 more years of the current fascist in chief.
24 days ago - Thursday 6/18/20 - 4:39:17 PM EST (GMT-5)
good.
24 days ago - Thursday 6/18/20 - 4:44:26 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Thursday 6/18/20 - 3:28:29 PM postallbear wrote:
These close wins for issues that should be no-brainers just proves we can't have 4 more years of the current fascist in chief.


Justice Thomas' statement indicates that it really wasn't a 'no brainer'.

From the link:
"Justice Clarence Thomas, in his dissent, wrote: "Today's decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision.""
24 days ago - Thursday 6/18/20 - 4:55:54 PM EST (GMT-5)
Thanks for inadvertently proving postal's point.
24 days ago - Thursday 6/18/20 - 4:59:31 PM EST (GMT-5)
On Thursday 6/18/20 - 4:55:54 PM birdsong4j wrote:
Thanks for inadvertently proving postal's point.


That it's best to set aside the law for political gain?



You need to be logged in to post a reply

New to YT? Create a Free Account ~ Have an Account? Log In

Back to Thread List
Top

 
Edit